the sm57 gets more use as one due to its heritage. The dynamic mic is a durable product that you can trust to make use on the road or for studios. The SM57 is designed into a cardioid pickup pattern which helps to ensure the main sound is clear and any background noise is reduced to the barest minimum. The i5 is more natural sounding and less compressed than the SM57. When used to live, it also does well with instruments and vocals. You don't say if it's an acoustic or an elec. In my opinion the Audix i5 is a great vocal mic for me in my band, but everyone has a different situation. It’s solid build and reliable performance make this dynamic mic a typical first-choice for anyone. Only a few microphones can compare with the reputation which the Shure 57 has. Which musical instrument would you like to master, if given the chance? If Audix, an OM5 or OM7 for vocals , depending on the type of music (the 5 requires you to sing tighter to the mic). The i5 is more natural sounding and less compressed than the SM57. Because of my love of recording, I am forced to experiment due to the need to be creative, and this process often begins with mic choice and mic placement; so it s absolutely essential I try different things. It would be wrong not to experiment, and risk losing other alternatives down the line, so I threw the i5 on my voice for a rehearsal last night. Both of them are top picks and you would enjoy your choice. fairly frankly, enormously plenty each venue i've got ever performed, no count if bar or club, has had 'em. When used to live, it also does well with instruments and vocals. The mic is a cardioid microphone and has a frequency response of 50 Hz to 16 kHz. Dynamic vocal microphones are the most popular type of vocal microphone for live performances because of their durability, flexibility, pattern control and cost. It’s also a great choice for high-volume amplifiers. Dynamic mics allow for a good vocal recording, have an impressive aesthetic appeal and are placed on shock mounts. Oh, and the i5 actually sounds great on vocals too! Because the i5 is smaller, it’s easier to fit into tight spaces that may be otherwise cumbersome for the SM57. Audix dynamic instrument microphones are widely used by sound engineers and musicians throughout the world. Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. It’s solid build and reliable performance make this dynamic mic a … It would work to set up a dynamic mic as a "room mic" and just see what you get - but usually the pick-up pattern is way too close to the mic to be useful in that way. It's not really sensitive enough for vocals. Get your answers by asking now. This makes it a great choice for recording loud instruments such as drums. Because the i5 is smaller, it’s easier to fit into tight spaces that may be otherwise cumbersome for the SM57. However, the Audix i5 compares favorably to it. or do I need two, because I really don't want to buy another one, and I dont have the money either.. No - for vocals what you want is a tight response dynamic (not condenser) mic. You will never, ever go wrong purchasing a Shure SM58 for your vocals, and an SM57 for your guitar or to mic up an amplifier. You can sign in to vote the answer. - You need those to mix in and make the sound "real" . How do you think about the answers? It’s capable of handling SPLs as high as 140 dB, so you can be sure that the noise will not get to this mic and it will perform well. The i5 is able to handle sound pressure levels in excess of 140 dB without distortion and can be used to mic a wide variety of musical instruments, guitar and bass cabinets, vocals and speech. There are more expensive Shure mics now - but trust me - a 58 for vocals and a 57 for utility work and you'll be in great shape. - but then you'll also need some mics you can set up for "room mics" - or if you're recording a gig - to mic the crowd and the room as well as the band. The only real difference is the ball "pop" filter on the 58. And the fee is around one hundred$. i've got seen them dropped, thrown at a drummer (completely smart, of direction), had beer spilled on them, and so on, and nevertheless artwork merely advantageous. Between 1986 and 1989, Audix broke new ground with the OM Series of vocal microphones with VLM™ (Very Low Mass) technology. What you'd need there is a very sensitive condensor mic . ? Buyers and musicians can expose it too long hours of use. The reason behind its popularity is the fact that people can trust on this dynamic mic to do its job and offer the best quality of sound when used with either vocals and instruments. Taking a look at both dynamic mics, the quality of both is quite obvious. The i5 is also a very competent vocal mic for stage use, while those studio singers who prefer the solid sound of a dynamic model may choose to use it that way in the studio. The price of this microphone is quite similar to that of the sm57. 1) How close? You'll need separate mics for voice, instrument, etc. Won't sound the best but will be good enough for scratch takes, demos, etc. Despite the cheap price of the mic, the Audix i5 is known to pack quite a number of features that easily make it stand out. response is optimized for the workhorse applications - drums, miccing speaker cabinets, etc. Shure SM57 is the common for the two stay and studio recording for electric powered guitars. Physically the i5 doesn’t fail but is design is pretty basic. I told the guy I wanted a mic that would do vocals, guitar, and both at the same time. But you’ll find this masterpiece more in recording studios. Absolutely it will work. The SM57 is an industry faithful and has been trusted for years.